1. I meant the article about an LSU loss.
  2. It was pretty blatant, I think, that he wanted LSU to lose--and now he's one of our TWO AP reporters from Louisiana. That's just terrific.
  3. Had to be one of the worst writing articles that i have ever read. Maybe he should move to Ole Miss and write for them.
  4. The only thing I didn't like about it was his remark that he was happy that LSU lost because it would have made good story. Apparently the only reason he wanted them to win was so he could go to Miami. Some Tiger fan.
  5. He isn't one for sure !
  6. Thats why I hated Glen for this article, when you read between the lines you can see how badly he wants to **** on LSU. He also just wanted to get the game over so he could get done with his work. That kind of attitude about football is the formula for crap writing. I would love to see the original articles from many LSU games.
  7. He never said that.

    He said as a writer, he was happy (i.e., with the way the article was written).
  8. We've beat this dead horse into the ground.

    But, heaven forbid if JR has another bad game against a tough SEC opponent this Friday, then "very good" is about the best compliment you can pay the young man. I thought that was fair. The use of the words "most unappreciated" was definitely a compliment.

    The guy is not an LSU fan, I'll give you that.