I'll use one of your earlier quotes to respond to this one:
the average jackass has no idea what is good for him.
And you act like the whole world just wants to be rich and happy. I guess that's why all those oil-rich arabs are such a cheerful bunch. For a political science guy, you sure do fail to consider all the political aspects in your analysis of these sorts of things. Nevermind, I forgot, we'll solve all that when we finish spreading democracy around the world.
Yes, they do take money from some of us. They also provide for those you think don't even deserve a minimum wage. Go back to your "communist revolution" comment and chew on it for awhile.
I don't. I just want enough balance to where poor people aren't banding together to try to overthrow the government with votes or other not-so-friendly means. So far, its worked pretty good for 230 or so years (unless you throw in the Civil War, I guess, which is a lesson in its own right).
The demand greatly exceeding the supply is what I worry about. Take the U.S. supply out of the equation, and leave our demand in the equation, and that's exactly what you'll have.
Cheaper than what? I say its cheaper if our taxes ensure an adequate supply that keeps market prices much lower than they would be if there were shortages.
I know, more pharmaceutical research.
So, you still haven't learned that freedom isn't exactly free. A lot of people have had to sacrifice a lot more than a few dollars for freedom. I don't think I have any room to complain.
What was that JS said........
Click to expand...