Infighting is petty

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by KTeamLSU, Nov 24, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Mr. Peabody

    Mr. Peabody Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,061
    Likes Received:
    141
    My post about his rep points was made in jest.

    Do you really take everything you read so seriously?

    Lighten up and enjoy a little fun every once in a while.
     
  2. KTeamLSU

    KTeamLSU Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,732
    Likes Received:
    61
    .... just kill the thread... I was irrated... wasn't taking it seriously
     
  3. BRETT

    BRETT LSU FAN Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2001
    Messages:
    3,073
    Likes Received:
    672
    Sorry KTeamLSU but I have to reopen this one. Your original point is valid.

    Differing opinions is what makes a forum great but this one could use a little less venom.
     
  4. KTeamLSU

    KTeamLSU Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,732
    Likes Received:
    61
    Its ok Brett, i still stand by my opinion, just got tired of defending my civility so I just killed it... but if you also agree to its validity then I have no problem with some more conversation on the topic.
     
  5. Mr. Peabody

    Mr. Peabody Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,061
    Likes Received:
    141
    It's one thing if it gets out of hand and personal attacks start to take place.

    I think this one was just a little playful sparring back and forth.

    :thumb:
     
  6. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    26,080
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    I haven't done the research but I'd bet that the personal attacks and "venom" are mainly in FSA relative to Bush/Kerry posts. The sports discussions prompt a lot of disagreements (QB performance, OC play calling, whether this team is good or poor, etc.) but the debates seem to remain civil (Auburn contributions included).
     
  7. islstl

    islstl Playoff committee is a group of great football men Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2003
    Messages:
    46,115
    Likes Received:
    9,705
    Simply showing FACTS with numbers does not mean I support the idea that USC in #1. In fact, my in-depth analysis the other day placed USC #3 behind Auburn and OU. Look at my sig line. It's quite clear how I feel about USC. Regarding the SEC, ask Mr. Peabody how much an SEC homer I am. He might not admit it tho, since he's still peaved I think Auburn is better than OU and more deserving of being in the NC.

    That being said, at this point in time, LSU cannot stay on the same field as USC. It's time to face reality and lose the denial.
     
  8. TigerEducated

    TigerEducated Founding Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Messages:
    3,118
    Likes Received:
    4
    Do you actually read what you type? You're description of your posts is as nauseating as your attitude of "Self Appointed Tool-Elect" of Tiger Forums...

    You need to start typing this stuff out in Word or something and then re-reading it, because you are coming off like a serious goofball these days...and I'm saying this honestly because I know you have good sense and are an intelligent guy.

    You are in need of some perspective. Back away from the Forum! Unplug, man!
     
  9. islstl

    islstl Playoff committee is a group of great football men Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2003
    Messages:
    46,115
    Likes Received:
    9,705
    Sorry I don't say things you wanna hear TE.

    I bet you did not even read the post I am referring to. The thread in question was about who do you think should be in the title game out of the top 3 teams, and I did an in-depth analysis of the 3 teams, supporting the fact that USC should more than likely be the odd man out.
     
  10. TigerEducated

    TigerEducated Founding Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Messages:
    3,118
    Likes Received:
    4
    I wasn't commenting on the content of the original post, you frog hair splitter...I was commenting on the delusions of grandeur you carry around with you on this site like so many pimps with their fur coats on the corner...I am beginning to think those rep points you have are going to your head...and I find it odd that a majority of this site has shown you the past few days they disagree with you, yet your rep points are remaining relatively the same...

    Crawfish, your theory you told me about via Private Message might actually have some merit...

    I don't have to comment on the original content to comment on the MANNER IN WHICH YOU CARRY YOURSELF HERE.

    If adverbs have a place in the English language (describing adjectives and other adverbs), then I can comment on the post itself and your description of it without actually worrying about the endless hypothetical arguments you devolve yourself into on a nightly basis here.

    You still never really responded when your little poll question blew up in your face about who reads the "babble" I post here...I think you're afraid to admit that people here might actually read and agree with things that "don't compute" in your linear thinking mind...

    As I said...Switch to decaf, pop an extra Zoloft, or perhaps GET OUT FROM IN FRONT OF THE MONITOR!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page