IVAN MAISEL: Junk food doesn't build strong bones.

Alabama dominated Arkansas, and considering how everyone says how horrible we are, that must equate to a terrible conference top to bottom.

 

USC played junk food teams from start to finish in 2003. In 2003, Oklahoma had one of the best defenses in history, and then Kansas State beat them. Why do you guys care at all what these people say. Your team either has talent and is well coached, or they're not. Cupcakes or not.

 

Careful, one of those junk teams USC played in 2003 was Auburn.:wink:

 

I think the strength of the SEC was SHOWN LOUD AND CLEAR this weekend.

Any given Saturday any SEC team can walk into someones house and beat them.

From Top to Bottom SEC is the toughest conf out there!

 

Well if you take the average of all the teams played it will still come out as junk.:thumb:

 

Maisel should take his own advice when voting for PAC-10 teams then. :dis:

 

Excuse me, Scrappy.

LSU's donation of 16 pts against Florida - leading to their loss margin - was all self-induced and had nothing to do with the level of competition.

I'm just glad you've never been my bridge partner in a tournament for all your faulty reasoning.

 

so 3 SEC teams lose to 3 other SEC teams, 2 of whom were ranked and that somehow is a knock on the SEC?

this Ark/USC game will be brought up all year while they ignore the Zona/WSU/Cal games. a Cal team that blew Oregon out last week as well.

 

Scrappy, you seem to be enjoying LSU's woes a bit much. But the big question is: Does Missouri have what it takes to beat the big guys in the Big 12 (whoever THEY are)?

They have a good QB. I've seen him play throughout high school up here in the Dallas area.

 

We do know that if USC played Ark now the score would be closer, seems logical, right? It also seems logical that a Cal/Tennessee game right now would also be more competitive, right?

So, really, what's your point?:wink: