TE...I don't post very often but I got involved in this discussion a few weeks back and I agree with you now, as I did then. Comparing Mauck of 02 & 03 with Randall of 02 is apples and oranges. In 02, Mauck got fat against the cupcakes, while Randall got thrown to the lions. Everyone will bring up the 2002 Fla game, but I think that is overblown. Mauck's TD passes in that game were due to great individual efforts by Henderson. But to be fair, he did play a fine game so let's equate it to Randall's performance against USC. Randall in 02 did not have near the defense that we had this past year. Not knocking Mauck...I appreciate everything he did. I just don't think there is as much disparity between the two as others seem to. All the things that people badmouth Randall for, could very easily apply to Mauck. I've seen him make some bad decisions. I saw him have happy feet as well. He threw some bad ints. Several times I saw him run out of bounds for a sack when he could have thrown it into the stands. These shortcomings however, were overlooked because the end result was that we won the games this year as opposed to last. Bottom line question I would ask the Randall bashers is this: Which games in 2002 that we lost with Randall at QB, would we have won if Mauck had been the QB?