Josh Booty's girlfriend???

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by Richdog, Mar 24, 2004.

  1. bengalfan

    bengalfan Freshman

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wrong.

    Porn of any type is labeled for the response to it. It's not her masterbation, but does it make you feel the need???????

    Separate the act from the actor and judge the act Sir. The underwear and swim suit would seem to elicit a sexual response from most heterosexual males along with some of the ladies out there. Therfore she is involved in an act that would be labeled "Pornograghic". From there you can ask the question is she as an avowed Christian involved in an act that a Christion should be. I think from there you can say no. At that point she has judged herself by being involved in the act.
     
  2. G_MAN113

    G_MAN113 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2003
    Messages:
    3,386
    Likes Received:
    19
    Gotta respectfully disagree here, pal. Some people might get their jollies by
    looking at the ladies undergarments section of the Sears catalog. Does that
    mean we should label the Sears catalog pornographic? Because by your definition, it is.
     
  3. BB

    BB Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2004
    Messages:
    2,038
    Likes Received:
    3
    I just spoke with her on the phone and aside from assuring me that she is leaving Josh to FINALLY be with me, she sends her apologies to anyone who is offended by her pictures... OK, she won't stop calling - I have to go.
     
  4. G_MAN113

    G_MAN113 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2003
    Messages:
    3,386
    Likes Received:
    19
    Dude, you need to wake up.

    Funny though, I keep having that same dream...only instead, it's Tara Reid calling me. :D :D :D
     
  5. bengalfan

    bengalfan Freshman

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    You are too young to remeber the reactions of the generations before mine. The catolog was viewed as just such a thing for them as they had not seen in the public forum so much as an ankle. The catalog did have that affect on that generation. It was the first source of soft porn in that time. Is it today???? Depends on the individual that is leafing those pages. I say again it is defined by the response. If the response to scantily clad women draws that response then it is what it is regardles of its acceptance.
     
  6. Ectopic Tiger

    Ectopic Tiger Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    555
    Likes Received:
    3
    I can appreciate the beauty of a woman's body without it "eliciting a sexual response". I would assume that most men who have actually seen a woman in real life (not just a photo) naked (not just with a bathing suit) would agree that this isn't quite enough to get them off. Sorry, but maybe for some adolecsent teen this is porn, but not for the target audience.
     
  7. Pastimer

    Pastimer Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2003
    Messages:
    640
    Likes Received:
    6
    Maybe he practices the "laying on of hands" with her ... heh-heh
     
  8. cajdav1

    cajdav1 Soldiers are real hero's

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2003
    Messages:
    7,493
    Likes Received:
    1,331
    To call this porn is quite a stretch by any imagination. 95% of all women dress all the time in a way that will illicit a sexual response when they're dressed up, wearing tight jeans and shorts, tank tops and sundresses, etc. Would you suggest Bengalfan that we should go back to the days where a women doesn't show anything other than her ankles, or even to a more prudish and discriminate muslim garb and not let them show their face in public. Should women in bikini's be outlawed? Has your wife ever dressed suggestively with a semi low cut blouse or tight dress that showed her curves or a T-shirt than enhanced her breast or wore jeans that showed off her butt. If she has then by the explanations of what you guys consider porn she has dressed in a porn like manner also. Ridiculous in my opinion. The beauty of a women should not ever be considered porn when used in the way of these pictures.
     
  9. bengalfan

    bengalfan Freshman

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hmmmm

    You are confused. What it is by definition is not altered by your acceptance of it or your desire to dress your wife in a burka(sp?). Now pick up the remote and change the channel to your favorite sports station (Arab garb=too much cnn).


     
  10. cajdav1

    cajdav1 Soldiers are real hero's

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2003
    Messages:
    7,493
    Likes Received:
    1,331

    1 : the depiction of erotic behavior (as in pictures or writing) intended to cause sexual excitement
    2 : material (as books or a photograph) that depicts erotic behavior and is intended to cause sexual excitement
    3 : the depiction of acts in a sensational manner so as to arouse a quick intense emotional reaction <the pornography of violence

    Behavior and acts seems to me needs to be included to be the definition of porn. Not a beautiful model wearing a bathing suit or underwear.
     

Share This Page