Kerry for president

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by Sourdoughman, Mar 17, 2004.

  1. Sourdoughman

    Sourdoughman TigerFan of LSU and the Tigerman

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Messages:
    12,315
    Likes Received:
    561
    I think we've all heard the story about Kerry talking to foreign leaders and the president calling him out on it and he has yet to respond.

    The other day Kerry was at a town meeting and someone kept asking him
    which foreign leaders have you talked too?
    Now some may think he was a plant and even if he was should carry at least
    let people know who he's talking about?
    Kerry responded by saying he talked to some foreign leaders on the phone and
    not in person.

    Thoughts, Ideas?
     
  2. rickyd

    rickyd Founding Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2003
    Messages:
    570
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually, Kerry told a potential voter, it was none of his business, then wanted to know, who the guy had voted for in the last election. Now that, is, NONE of Kerry's business!!!
     
  3. Golden Tiger

    Golden Tiger Founding Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2002
    Messages:
    734
    Likes Received:
    13
    It was just typical Kerry.....Flip Flop. :dis:
     
  4. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,733
    Of course Kerry can't name foreign leaders. They still have to deal with Bush. But it is no secret that much of the world and most of our closest allies are not fans of GW Bush and would love to see an administration change.

    I'm not surprised if some of them are starting to court Kerry secretly. Kerry should have kept his mouth shut about it, however. Better to let the foreign leaders leak the news and that won't happpen until closer to the election.
     
  5. MLUTiger

    MLUTiger Secular Humanist

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2001
    Messages:
    4,606
    Likes Received:
    810
    >>Of course Kerry can't name foreign leaders. They still have to deal with Bush. But it is no secret that much of the world and most of our closest allies are not fans of GW Bush and would love to see an administration change.

    What better reason to vote for Bush?

    Neither one of them are talking about cutting spending and no matter who wins, a Sull-n-boneser is in the White House. The only votes that Kerry is actually getting are the "Anyone but Bush" votes which stem from the "Al Gore won, Bush robbed him", "France doesn't like us" and "My dream store would be a place that sold Birkenstocks and Starbucks" crowd.

    I really like his idea to implement a $900 million dollar healthcare plan while balancing the budget.
     
  6. mesquite tiger

    mesquite tiger Diabolical Genius

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Messages:
    3,967
    Likes Received:
    66
    Do none of yall find it very ironic that the people of Spain voted in a landslide to elect a new President last week, one that is in favor of removing troops from the war in Iraq and believes it was wrong for them to be over there?

    I think a true indicator of whether or not Americans were behind the war in Iraq or not will be told when we hit the polls in November. I do not doubt Kerry's statement that he has spoken to many political leaders of the world and they disagree with GW, and I do not blame him for not naming names. We are seeing it slowly but surely everyday in instances like Spain.
     
  7. G_MAN113

    G_MAN113 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2003
    Messages:
    3,386
    Likes Received:
    19
    What you saw in Spain was an instance of a populace still in shock going to
    the polls ...and without time to consider the consequences of what they were doing, they went with their collective gut reaction, and basically caved in to the terrorists. I seriously doubt you'll see that in this country...at least I hope you don't.
     
  8. Sourdoughman

    Sourdoughman TigerFan of LSU and the Tigerman

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Messages:
    12,315
    Likes Received:
    561
    What you guys failed to mention, there is nothing Al-Quaida and the terrorists would love to happen more than George Bush and the war on terror be replaced by John Kerry.

    Am I correct on this statement or am I not?
     
  9. USMTiger

    USMTiger Founding Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2003
    Messages:
    1,668
    Likes Received:
    167
    "I originally voted for the 87 Million dollars, but then I voted against it" -John Kerry when asked about not voting to provide 87 Million dollars to the military to maintain the Iraqi efforts.


    Don't worry people, John Kerry will defeat himself in this election. All Bush has to do is show up. When you tell so many lies and flip flop on so many issues that you can't even keep track of them all, you have a long way to go before you can become President.

    Remember, if John Kerry had his way (based on HIS ACTUAL VOTING RECORD), the Soviet Union would still be in a Cold War with us, Saddam Hussein would currently still be in Kuwait enjoying the nice beach-side view, the CIA would have gone bankrupt long ago, and the troops would not have any type of modern weapons system, because he voted against them all.

    You libs need to get past the whole brainwashing process that was done to you, probably since you were born, and look at the world in terms of facts and realities, not abstract ideals and appeasments. John Kerry is dangerous for America at this crucial point in our history.

    I think it'll be a landslide when all is said and done. Dukakis II.
     
  10. Jetstorm

    Jetstorm Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,218
    Likes Received:
    29
    Landslide Mesquite? You call 53% for the Socialists a landslide? While the Al-Qaida bombing in Spain did influence enough Spaniards to swing their votes in favor of appeasing and surrendering to terror, I take solace in the fact that about 44% of the Spanish people still have some guts. It was not a landslide.
     

Share This Page