Looking Ahead: What's your opinion regarding offensive philosophy in '05?

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by TigerEducated, Jan 25, 2005.

  1. Golden Tiger

    Golden Tiger Founding Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2002
    Messages:
    734
    Likes Received:
    13
    I agree. :thumb:
    The bubble screen is one heck of a weapon, gives the D-Backs something to really worry about and can score from anywhere on the field.........Why would you not like to see LSU run it......?
     
  2. StaceyO

    StaceyO Football Turns Me On

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2003
    Messages:
    15,643
    Likes Received:
    8,487
    I don't really think we have a question mark at TE. David Jones is incredible. The only question about him is WHY we didn't throw to him more often on '04--all he did when he was thrown to was score TD's or make first downs.
     
  3. Dirt Dog

    Dirt Dog Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2004
    Messages:
    1,556
    Likes Received:
    3
    For what it's worth, the bubble screen is best used vs. a 3-deep or soft M2M. Also good vs. zone blitz.

    I don't remember really seeing that many true bubble screens that much. I didn't see every play of the season, but did see WR screens like jailbreak. Jimbo has used this a lot though.

    [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  4. fanatic

    fanatic Habitual Line Stepper

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    13,667
    Likes Received:
    6,015
    I echo the sentiments of what others have said. I would like to see a balanced, wide open attack that utilizes our speed at receiver. I wouldn't mind seeing a pass thrown to the tight end every now and then just to mix things up. Combined with the different running styles of Addai, Vincent, and Broussard and we could have an unstoppable attack if it's done right. Throw in a DC that keeps the defense dominant and I see great things for this team.
     
  5. NoLimitMD

    NoLimitMD Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,551
    Likes Received:
    366
    I like Addai too (yea, def. underutilized), but am surprised you're not impressed w/ Broussard! He's such a vertical runner, fast, and will hit a safety in the mouth. I'll take that all day long. :geauxtigs
     
  6. Tennessee Robb

    Tennessee Robb Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    6
    Who will be the receiver?

    Our running backs, even JV, impress me with their heart and effort. Our receivers do not. I want to see long pass plays in the worst way. Davey is my favorite LSU QB of all time replacing Hodson who replaced Jones. Davey had Reed: Hodson had Davis: Jones had Hamilton: Who will be the receiver to turn it up a notch and make quick reads followed by precise route running? It'd be nice to see the lightbulb turn on and know that we have a receiver at LSU that gets it.

    Buster - strong possibility
    Early - hope for a breakout year
    Skyler - doubt it.
    Bowe - inconsistent so far but seems to have a connection with Russell already
    Xavier - anyone got an idea?
    Amp Hill - Coach Saban once had high praise for him

    One thing is certain. I feel alot better about our offense after thinking about each of these receivers individually. If Coach Miles can get them to compete for PT and improve as receivers we will be very good.
     
  7. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Until a quarterback emerges that can sustain a passing game, LSU will likely be a power running team in 2005. With talent and depth on the line and in the backfield, LSU will lead the SEC in rushing again.

    The passing game must improve this year to keep us in the top tier and I think it will. Jimbo will continue to evolve his offense to suit the talent and the opposition. The only concern I've ever had with his offense is the way-too-predictable draw play on third and long.

    The bubble screen is fine against the right defense and we've gained a lot of yards with it in previous years. If defenses have caught up then we will move on. As Charlie Mac once said, "When you have a play that's working, you keep running it until they stop it."
     
  8. TigerWins

    TigerWins Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    Messages:
    4,666
    Likes Received:
    157
    I too like the bubble screen, but it's not so effective without a vertical passing game threat. In 2003, it was effective because we had Mauck who could get the ball to Clayton and Henderson downfield. We also had a healthy Green and WRs who were effective blockers.

    I think it can be a very good weapon this year if we have some success throwing the ball downfield. And Green should be healthy.
     
  9. veedo

    veedo Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2004
    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would like to see Miles or Jimbo really sit down with our qb's and teach them how to read a defense. I have to believe that this has already been done, but I think that this is something that can only help the more they do it. Maybe Jimbo will be able to spend more time with the qb's since Miles is a more offensive minded coach.
     
  10. BB

    BB Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2004
    Messages:
    2,038
    Likes Received:
    3
    If I can tell from my seat that the play is a bubble screen (and I most often can) then I have to believe the defense has "caught up to it" but likes their chances stopping it. How could any coach review film and not see that play a mile away. I think they let us do it and take their chances defending it.

    Personally, I don't dislike the play - I dislike the frequency and the predictability of the play call. We have a QB with a missle launcher attached to his shoulder and the fastest WR's in America - tossing the football sideways to an idle receiver and asking (then a freshman) Early Doucet to block an SEC DB never feels right. Just my $0.02...
     

Share This Page