It you highlight this your browser should be able to define the following phrase which depicts your latest diatribe, @TigerTap Antiquarian superfluity.
Yes, really, a diatribe. One racially infused at that. Understand, your conspiracy theories amuse me. Your views on Bama v LSU clearly indicate how small minded you are. In fact, I'll go as far as saying a demitasse would fit your mind like a sombrero. A suggestion: Don't attempt to be an asshole to me or others around here, because then you force everyone to be an asshole to you...and we're way better at being an asshole than you are. For what it is worth, the preceding is a declarative statement.
Over time I've seen you reference the influence the NY Times has had on recent success. I've seen the references to ESPN's influence along with the Birmingham angle. Repeatedly, I've seen references to Patterson's catch/no catch. A conclusion, easily drawn, is you're looking to place blame on other things outside of those that could be handled by the LSU team and staff. To me, that's a small minded view. It's certainly not an attack and by no means an insult. I don't consider being called an asshole to be an insult. It's not an attack either. It's a moniker. Now, while my Alma mater happens to be Alabama, and certainly where my allegiance lies in collegiate athletics, being a Bama fan isn't what draws me here. It serves as a nice respite away from things, many things, that grate my nerves about reading Bama sites exclusively.
