Looks good to me, but there is no way in hell Auburn does no better than .500 in the SEC, and Ole Miss goes 6-2. They should at least be swapped, IMO.
While I agree with the guy that Auburn is overrated, I don't think they are nearly as overrated as he thinks. I definitely think they will have a better record than 7-5.
Maybe the guy is an Auburn fan and he wants to lower their expectations: His overall outlook: "There is not a more overrated team in the country. There is no question the (Auburn) Tigers have the talent to win the SEC West in 2003. But having the talent to win a national championship is a huge question. Road games at LSU and Georgia will be the main reasons why they won't accomplish either goal. The Tigers need to somehow win those games, and beat Tennessee and Alabama at home, and they won't be able to do it. " This is the first "tempered" prediction of AU's season that I've seen so far.
Or maybe he's from Baton Rouge with the predictions on LSU. Let's be real here, #4? Coincidentally, the main page show's a quote on the bottom regarding a previous poll they conducted. The quote is from a person in......Baton Rouge.
Ole Priss will have a conference record of 4-4, at best. They've never had a winning SEC record "SINCE EXPANSION".