Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. dink and dunk. I think he had 2 maybe 3 passes of 20 yds or more and I don't think any over 25. When I say throw the ball I mean throw it! 29 glorified handoffs is not throwing the ball.
    lsu-i-like likes this.
  2. Slow your roll chatty Kathy I am agreeing with you about he waits too long (which makes our OL look worse than it is BTW) and that he is too tenative throwing deep. However he may be our best option untill he corrects that or Nuss stops throwing INT's or Howard beats them all out. If Nuss or Howard could improve our offense don't you believe Kelly would replace JD?
  3. No his ego won't allow it. The more I think about it we should start Walker.
  4. You guys need to chill! He's playing behind a whole new OL, that includes two true freshmen and two transfers that aren't SEC caliber. That's exactly why we also suck at running the ball because there's no where to run. I agree he's not the most gifted passer, but give him and the OL a chance to gel. He's the best we got under the circumstances. Nuss has proven he can't be trusted to protect the ball and WH would get killed behind that OL. Brighter days are ahead, but right now we are rebuilding the program and that takes time.
    BornOnTheBayou likes this.
  5. Oh
  6. Do you think he's being paid 10 million a year because he has a huge ego?
  7. Tell me why we shouldn't
  8. I gave a stat and said that’s too bad. You guys are just so black and white about this whole thing. If anyone says anything, they’re negatigers. Dear lord, calm down
    Winston1 and shane0911 like this.
  9. Because we are not at the practices with Walker Howard, we are not reviewing videos of Walker Howard and we are not with Walker Howard everyday like our coaches are.
    Chipeace likes this.
  10. I agree with everything you say except the part about giving them time to gel...my only beef with that is the underlying premise that they actually CAN gel.

    We have 3 stud OLs committed to LSU in the 2023 class. Brighter days are ahead.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.