Actually, you could point to how we didn't get the pick on that same drive, since it went through Webster's arms, and that's what cost us. You could also say that since the LSU offense gave the ball up to Auburn before that, that the LSU offense cost us the game there, since if we can continue to chew up ground, we can run the clock out. You could also say that if we could have stopped the actual touchdown throw, we win, period, and that one cost us. My point in all this is it was a one point loss. It was controversial. It was a one point controversial call loss. Was the call not controversial? Was the loss not by one point? Why am I defending the wording of a post? You guys need to ease up!
