1. C'mon Martin, surely you're not going to allow that kind of spelling from a 99.995 percentile poster, are ya. :wink:
  2. I don't even know - I was talking about Notre Dame-USC and ended up here.

    martin, again, you obviously don't understand how IQ works - it's not equivalent to testing.

    But, this is boring, so I'm leaving.
  3. typo if the a key was next to the e key. maybe you have one of those genius keyboards that are only available to the smartest people. ergonomics be damned.

    I'm not the one claiming a 162 IQ therefore I claim no such distinction and am allowed tpyos.
  4. i am not making fun of you. its just that people of your intelligence are so rare (1 in 19 thousand) that i am very interested in what you have to say.

  5. Did you have "practise" in band, cause you typo'd that one twice! :grin:
  6. usually you have to screw up a spelling 10 times or so before i mention it. i dont bother peeps about minor errors.
  7. I believe practise is acceptable ... but what do I know, my IQ is a tad under 162! :thumb:
  8. My dictionary is as old as me, and ise just doesn't look right by God. :lol:

    I can't even spell IQ much less have any idea what mine is. :grin:

    Yours is a tad under 162, I believe mine is just under a tad.
  9. Yes, it's the King's English.

    I see, you don't believe me. That's understandable considering I'm just someone on the internet with no way to prove something. The only reason I mentioned it was because I got incensed over the swipe at my supposedly low IQ. I really could not care less if you believe me or not, but yes, I have a 162 IQ - my brother actually has a 165. We're both in MENSA. We were very lucky to get good genes or something, I guess.

    Again, that doesn't mean I'm smart or have common sense (as I'm sure some would agree, seeing my posts), and I never claimed that it did.
  10. Now I do believe you, b/c most dumb people say they could care less, which is the exact opposite of what they meant to say. :thumb: