NY times Having children is bad for the enviroment.

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by Tiger10, Aug 11, 2009.

  1. Tiger10

    Tiger10 Founding Member

    Perhaps if you stop posting in my threads they might have a better environment.

    Maybe Im being a little harsh, so what I spelled something wrong! Can you get over it?:thumb:

    Its like bickering like kids, we argue about the things that dont matter. But if it makes you fell any better I will make a point to spell better.:):geaux:
     
  2. tirk

    tirk im the lyrical jessie james


    :nope::nope:
     
    1 person likes this.
  3. Bengal Buddy

    Bengal Buddy Founding Member

    Serious? You've got to be joking. I wonder how many tax dollars it took to produce a study that is about as useless as teets on a boar hog.
     
  4. LSUMASTERMIND

    LSUMASTERMIND Founding Member

    This guy is on a "role"...... or roll, which one is it.
    Sorry Im only "jokeing" and "haveing" a little fun.
     
    1 person likes this.
  5. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    About as serious as Sarah Palin. Our human presence itself is bad for the environment, so making new people is inherently part of it. It's stating the obvious.
     
  6. Tiger10

    Tiger10 Founding Member

    Point is people in the gov. and media are calling for population control.

    And that is serious!
     
  7. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    There is not one damn thing in that article about government and media calling for population control. You made it up.
     
  8. OkieTigerTK

    OkieTigerTK Tornado Alley

    and im shocked. shocked, i tell you!
     
  9. Tiger10

    Tiger10 Founding Member

    Oh the little you know. Check out the thread about the science czar before you make something up.
     
  10. Tiger10

    Tiger10 Founding Member

    You too, TIA.
     

Share This Page