OK, let's assume for the moment that it winds up LSU/USC in the Rose. Who has the advantage? It's already been established that USC got kicked by a mid-level team Saturday, so they'll be disappointed to be there. And we know our boys will be flying high to be in the Rose for the first time ever (not to mention that lingering hatred for the Trojans after the "shared" title in 2003). What will be the difference maker? I think we have more pure athletes than USC. Don't get me wrong - they're very talented. But think about it: our WRs, our QB (versus "homeboy" Booty), our DBs, and our DL are all superior athletes to theirs. If we can get our kick return game in order (no muffs, fumbles, or dreaded "block in the back" silliness), I think we win this by 2 tds. Any thoughts? :lsup: BTW, I hope and pray we get them in this game. There will be nothing like beating them on their own turf to shut them up once and for all, especially after '03. We've all waited too long for this one.:helmet:
Dude, two posts in. Lose the hard-to-read font. We wanna respect your thoughts but your pronunciation ain't working.
herbs right...he made some good point tonight and criticized voters for not picking michigan just b/c its a rematch.
What exactly was wrong with his post? It's a helluva lot better than a lot of people on this forum with 1,000+ posts (grammatically and content-wise.) :shock:
Just in case Brett, here you go. I think it's going to look strange between the eyes, but tradition is tradition. :hihi:
