Yep Muslims don't screw around with small kills they go for the big kills you know the 3000 killed overall 9/11.

but rex is wrong in those shootings he mentioned there are 5 muslims involved. 5 of the 14 killers were muslim. and they are only 1% of the population

1., 2: san bernardino shooter is husband and wife muslim. wife is from pakistan, dude is from chicago with paki parents.
3, 4: two chechen muslim brothers did boston bombing, neither born in america
5. muslim orlando shooter, parents from afganistan

had we a muslim ban, none of these folks would be here. we coulda had hot girls from taiwan or argentina instead

Duly noted. Had I thought it out I would have looked this up. Just wanted to hit him with a massive obvious ommittment on his part.

It honestly felt like he was trolling himself. To claim those exact occurrences seemed silly to me when I read his post. Like he was being sarcastic and saying that Muslims are capable of white supremacy.

i did not understand what he was talking about.

Apparently not this one

https://www.fox19.com/2022/07/12/no...-got-abortion-indiana-ag-yost-tells-fox-news/

A fucking monkey with down syndrome and a mouth full of marbles could say anything better than you can

Looks like your hack AG had to eat his words.

His words were correct at the time he said them.
It appears this young girl traveled to Indiana to get an abortion 3 days after the deadline to have proceedure done. I would propose as the AG later did, she could have had the proceedure done legally in Ohio.

An Illegal alien from Guatemala has confessed to coercing the young girl into sex on more than one occasion, reportedly starting at age 9.
I have a lot of questions.
Why wasn't the lead story a 9/10 year old girl was raped. . Why wasn't it a 9/10 year old raped by an illegal alien.
She reportedly went to another state and had a proceedure done 3 days after the last date for it in Ohio. Thinking the proceedure could have been done in Ohio legally if people had been paying attention. And how do they know it was 3 days after 6 weeks since conception.

Reasons to be suspicious
Focus of the story wasn't the rape but the purported 3 day late trip to Indiana
No perpetrator was mentioned and no arrests were made until the story was discussed as being false. Has this guy been in custody all this time? Or just since yesterday?
The now 10 year old has identified the suspect as the "father of her pregnancy". Her mother reported it through Chld servioces on June 22. The perpetrator was arrested AFTER he confessed. Perpetrator said no rape just coerced? It is rape where I come from either way.
Perpetrator said multiple times apparently starting at age 9?
Where were her parents/ the cops/the media? Everyone too busy talking about the child traveling to Indiana for the proceedure.
It looks to me that this girl was a sacrfice to cause. This was all over the pro abortion coconunt telegraph/ mainstream media in seconds. Week later, after everyone says the story is probably fake, we suddenly get a perpetrator.

AG Comments on Tuesday
"I know the cops and prosecutors in this state," Yost said. "There's not one of them that wouldn't be turning over every rock, looking for this guy and they would have charged him. They wouldn't leave him loose on the streets ... I'm not saying it could not have happened. What I'm saying to you is there is not a damn scintilla of evidence."

Later Tuesday suddenly a suspect...(Columbus Dispatch)."On Wednesday, once news of the arraignment of the Columbus man accused in the child's rape came, Yost issued a single sentence statement:
"We rejoice anytime a child rapist is taken off the streets."
He later added that he's "absolutely delighted that this monster has been taken off the street. If convicted, he should spend the rest of his life in prison."

It wouldn't be the first time stories were made up by the left to make a political point. The whole thing was used to push a political point. There was almost no discussion of the crime or perpetrator at all. Her mother reported the preganancy through Child Services on June 22, the story went "viral" the first week of July. The proceedure was reportedly done in Indiana 3 days after the Ohio deadline around the first of July. Why wasn't it done in the week or so in between? Looks like to me the pro choice crowd is celebrating the rape of a 9 year old to make political points. Bad form but par for the course.

And the rape of a preteen girl by an illegal aliens who was allowed to come here and rape a 10 year old girl? Anything to say about the real story? Oh forgot you are with the party of pedophilia and death.