I don't believe it is at all. If someone hates the 1st candidate and wants that person not to be in office by any means, I see no reason that them voting for the 2nd person is "stupid".

be sure to cook them anything they just don't hate regardless if its good.

thanks, you too. and it was a mistake on my part to sneak that "moron" accusation in there about you. i edited it out quick, but you caught it. my fault, sorry bout that.

I got some trout and green beans.

Maybe some mashed potatoes. :hihi::thumb:

Upon deep reflection, I've managed to disect the flawed premise of Martin's debaters.

They think logic is defined differently to different people as with taste in art. "If it's logical to him then it's logical--to him at least."

Logic is universal, "A = A", let's call a spade a spade--The argument to vote for a "Non-Bush" candidate, just because, is just plain stupid.

that frogleg, he loves him some ayn rand.

Aristotle too:thumb:

yeah you need to climb out of rand's ass for a bit. :hihi: :hihi:

Me too.



"The Great Aristotle"

this talk made me thing of something interesting i never thought of before. in all of college, (i majored in political theory) i was never taught anything about rand. i get aristotle all day long, but rand, i have to read on my own. i guess rand isnt really taken seriously in mainstream academia. i am not sure what to make of that. not sure if it because she isnt all that great, or because universities are too politically correct for objectivism. probably a little of both.