In the KY game, there was an interference call against LSU...but the ball was tipped at the line...and that should've negated the penalty. The TV announcers said that wasn't reviewable by rule. Isn't that the same thing that was reviewed...AND REVERSED...last year against AU?
I could be wrong Fish but I think Danielson confidently said it was not reviewable but then (less confidently) corrected himself. Hope I'm recalling that correctly.
Interference is not reviewable. Meaning that you can't go back and look to see if DB made contact before the ball got there. However, whether or not a ball was tipped is reviewable. They did review it, and coreected the call.
Yes, it was reviewed and reversed in Aubarns' house. And it wasn't reviewed at UK's house. I'm sure its up to the refs to decide if they want to pursue the issue. I'm not saying that refs are cheaters but that maybe they let things slide a little for the home team, remember we didnt get called for the late hit on Captian Wonderman:shock: during the USC game.
No it wasn't. It was reversed on the field without an actual replay reversal. Yes it was, and was correctly reversed.
I don't know why...but I'm gonna take Nootch's word for it. :wink: If it was reversed, it must have happened while I was banging my head on the floor...and it took a while to get my head back on straight, so I didn't notice.:thumb: For some reason, I seriously doubt there is ANYTHING about the '06 AU game that Nootch doesn't know by heart.
It was definitely reversed because I was at the game with my dad and we were wondering what was being challenged, since you can't challenge an interference. But the ref came back and said that the ball was tipped at the line therfore there was no penalty.
