Re: SEC 3-6 against Pac-10 since 2000 Team for team, the SEC is better, but I just don't agree with you when you say the top five teams in the SEC could have beat USC in 03'. You'd be hard pressed to find many that would agree with you.
Re: SEC 3-6 against Pac-10 since 2000 It pains me to say this, but USC was a powerhouse for more than just the '03 season. Their 2 wins angainst AU were in seasons were the Barners finished 3rd in the west. Now tonight makes 2 wins against ARKY another team that will finish no better than 3rd in the west. So that means that half the PAC-10's wins came when their champ plays a middle of the pack SEC school. 2 more of their wins came in '02 and '03 when Oregon beat Miss. State. MEaning one of their top 2-3 teams beat our cellar dweller. The other win was UCLA over a 3-8 BAMA team when they were still a probation ridden nothing.
Re: SEC 3-6 against Pac-10 since 2000 Oh my God, NUTRIAITCH, I love your sig. Where the heck did you find that?
Re: SEC 3-6 against Pac-10 since 2000 I guess USC is just chopped liver... Ok, so it was also in 2004 when they were the undisputed best team and in 2005 when they were the second best team.
Re: SEC 3-6 against Pac-10 since 2000 Which part? The guy p***ing on the logo? I stole each part of it from other sites through out the last year.
Re: SEC 3-6 against Pac-10 since 2000 Saying that USC would have a harder time running the table in the SEC is in no way implying that the top 5 teams in the SEC would beat USC. The steady week in week out grind against tough competition in the SEC would wear on them and therefor making it tougher to run the table in 03', 04', and 05'. That does not mean that the top 5 teams in the SEC are all on par with USC.
