SEC declares "helmet to spine" hit OK

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by islstl, Nov 19, 2010.

  1. lsudolemite

    lsudolemite CodeJockey Extraordinaire

    Sue them for what? Slander? Those dirty hits didn't happen?
     
  2. lsudolemite

    lsudolemite CodeJockey Extraordinaire

    Of course there's a rule against it. It's called roughing the passer.

    Love the disclaimer further down, though. :hihi:
     
  3. islstl

    islstl Playoff committee is a group of great football men Staff Member

    Was watching SEC Gridiron Live today and Charles Davis said it.
     
  4. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason


    Not sure what you mean but I meant that it's obvious the SEC is trying to help Auburn.
     
  5. islstl

    islstl Playoff committee is a group of great football men Staff Member

    Meaning I was stating the obvious and wasn't something that was even in question for most people.
     
  6. Thorny

    Thorny Founding Member

    I guess the most disturbing part was something Danielson said during the UGA-AU game. He said that when asked, Chizik claimed he had not heard from the SEC about other coaches complaints. Now, I remember Les Miles mentioning that he talked to the SEC about the 1st qtr dead-ball late hit and the 4th qtr suplex throwdown on JJ. Whether you think Chizik lied about that or that the SEC didn't pass the concerns on, either option is disturbing.

    One thing is certain, the AU coaches haven't talked to Fairley about it. Otherwise, most of the non-sense during the UGA game wouldn't have happened.

    GEAUX TIGERS (GTHOM)
     

Share This Page