Yeah, the year we lost our final game of the regular season to Arkansas. Which is what she's going to come at you with here. She'll argue early loss vs late loss. I know the Trojan drill.
AP and Coaches. You'll have to aid my memory here...was the BCS doing weekly ratings at that time or just season-end?
Winning the game has nothing to do with my point. What other conference would be able to put a 2 loss team in the NC game? None. Only the SEC. And you also know you needed help that last weekend. BTW, eff that song girl shit. That ain't me.
What? Are you looking at the AP or something? It says it right there in your link . . . BCS Standings: 1 - Oklahoma 12-1 2 - LSU 12-1 3 - Southern Cal 11-1 If you are talking about the BCS being biased, then talk about the actual BCS rankings. USC ended up ranked #1 in 2 of the 11 final 2003 BCS rankings. LSU finished #1 in 9. That's NINE, as in the expression "over four times as many". I realize that we have argued this before. Clearly we must mud wrestle to determine the Will of God. Geez, I'm turning into tiga. I received way too much whiskey for Christmas.
And who was the undisputed best 2-loss team in America, with both losses in double overtime on the road in the SEC? You know, . . . the team that beat the number one team in the national championship game?[/QUOTE]
