the people who introduced the idea that Russians were involved disagree with your claim that there is evidence for Russian involvement. they have no evidence and said that explicitly. the emails on the laptop were confirmed to be real via crytography. it was proven to be literally impossible that they were russian disinfo.
hunter Biden claims he had a drug problem and there is evidence he was banging whores. if he was paying hookers to cross state lines this is human trafficking, is it not?
is the follow statement true "we do not have evidence of Russian involvement" where "we" is the list of national security and intelligence people who altered the press that Biden laptop could be Russian misinfo? and wasn't it later revealed via cryptographic evidence that the laptop emails were legit and in no wayRussian in origin? you cant answer can you?
and just what do those emails prove? they prove that he was a drug addict who liked to pay for pussy and who didn't pay his taxes for a few years....oh, and he lied on a gun application. that is what those emails prove. they do not prove money laundering, human trafficking or bribery. Not even close.
you can type in the largest font you want but it will not change the fact that the laptop never contained anything about money laundering, bribery or human trafficking. those were lies spread by Rudy Guiliani, who got them from the Russian group in Ukraine. This is well documented. I have provided said documentation for you already so I'll not do it again.
you sound like a petulant child pitching a fit, repeating something over and over because you are not getting your way. you don't like being called emotional but what else am I to think when you make posts like this. it's pathetic and child-like.
Hunter pled guilty to tax evasion and a gun charge. he never pled to money laundering, bribery or human trafficking as was promised so long ago. Hunger admitted his wrongdoing. What else is there to see here? I'll tell you what you cannot see: money laundering, bribery or human trafficking. Hunter's case isn't a RICO case. Joe Biden was never accused of any crime, much less indicted for one. Joe's not under investigatin. So there is really no way Hunter would flip on Joe. Joe hasn't done anything wrong. The difference is that Trump's attorney's are getting plea deals for their testimony against Trump. I never said Hunter was innocent. I've been quite clear that he is guilty of tax charges and a gun application charge. He made a plea agreement for those charges. Trump's people are admitting their guilt in the conspiracy and they are receiving lesser sentences for doing so. This is classic RICO prosecution. Trying to compare the two just show how little you know about our legal system, much less some purported bias that you always point to. These false equivalences make you look dumb, like you don't understand how our legal system works. Your answer for everything is either a conspiracy theory or to play the victim. Trump's always the victim...quite ironic for someone who claims to be an alpha dog. If not that then there is a grand conspiracy that can never be proven but is always at work against him and others like you.
Exactly. That laptop has been thoroughly investigated and run through every kind of cryptographic means possible and yet there is still no evidence of money laundering, bribery or human trafficking. Not a single shred of evidence. You'd think after all that investigative work they would have found something, huh? But nah...just some hookers, crack cocaine, failure to pay taxes and lying on a gun application. So thanks for verifying that they've done a thorough examination and still failed to turn up the money laundering, human trafficking and bribery.
He was not charged with human trafficking, not even close. You don't get to define what constitutes human trafficking.
