Mine is much more accepted by historians and is in line with the flow of historical thought. Yours is revisionist and made up to support your argument. Admit you're wro for once you'll feel better. Then get over it amigo.
When will you learn that you can't just declare that you are correct. You haven't come close to proving your point.
Just taking a page out of your book sport I have cited documents made comment based of history courses taken and books read over 40+ years. You have used a heavily edited definition from a dictionary. You ignore the facts that don't fit your narrative and look at a ancient event with either no understanding of what those contemptuous thought or no understanding that their thought had a much different lens. Without that context you conclusion has no value.
Whenever someone tries to make it about me instead of the argument, I know they are out of logic and resorting to desperate measures to remain relevant.