Super Bowl Questions

Discussion in 'New Orleans Saints Forum' started by LSUTiga, Jan 21, 2019.

  1. LSUTiga

    LSUTiga TF Pubic Relations

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    32,711
    Likes Received:
    11,248
    1/ Do you hold it against the LA Rams for a call the refs blew?
    2/ Are you pulling for them?


    I’m gonna pull for the Rams. New faces with a ring and I like Gurley. Their QB too. Had never watched him before last night.
     
  2. kcal

    kcal Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,841
    Likes Received:
    7,795
    if it were possible for the rams to lose the SB a thousand times over it wouldn’t be enough
     
  3. LSUTiga

    LSUTiga TF Pubic Relations

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    32,711
    Likes Received:
    11,248
    lol
     
  4. mctiger

    mctiger RIP, and thanks for the music Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2003
    Messages:
    26,149
    Likes Received:
    16,733
    My answer to all questions regarding SuperBowl*LXIII going forward will be,"I don't give a shit." Having said that, no; I don't hold it against the Rams. They played their game and they are a very good team; its not their fault the refs were incompetent.
     
    uscvball, Winston1, didit and 4 others like this.
  5. ehusson80

    ehusson80 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Messages:
    4,080
    Likes Received:
    2,926
    Absolutely. I can't really stomach either team winning a ring. I'll go with NE. Lesser of 2 evils...
     
    kcal and watson1880 like this.
  6. watson1880

    watson1880 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2006
    Messages:
    3,637
    Likes Received:
    2,009
    I won't really watch... I am sure someone will have a party and I'll have my backed turned to the tv pouring drinks. Anyway the lambs are the NFL's chosen team, may them and goodell rot in hell.

    #fireroger
     
    Bengal B likes this.
  7. Bengal B

    Bengal B Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2002
    Messages:
    47,986
    Likes Received:
    22,992
    There is a rule in place, they said rule 17, that in an especially egregious situation gives the commissioner the power to reverse the call on non call on the field and schedule the resumption of the game from the point of the infraction. Good luck on getting Roger Goodell to do the right thing.
     
  8. mctiger

    mctiger RIP, and thanks for the music Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2003
    Messages:
    26,149
    Likes Received:
    16,733
    There's a petition started asking him to do it, and they've got about 160,000 signatures already. The rule is meant to cover things like weather disruptions, power outages, or a natural disaster disrupting the game. In fact, the rule specifically states its not meant to be a means for a team to protest the results after the fact.
     
  9. fanatic

    fanatic Habitual Line Stepper

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    13,665
    Likes Received:
    6,012
    Right, can you imagine the precedent that would set? Any team with a beef about a call/no call would want the same treatment. And the petition is just gay. It won't make one bit of difference.
     
    uscvball and COTiger like this.
  10. Bengal B

    Bengal B Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2002
    Messages:
    47,986
    Likes Received:
    22,992
    It's at change.org. Sign it, send it to everybody you know and ppst it on your sociam media accounts.
    https://www.ajc.com/news/national/t...atch-after-blown-call/9MHyYcaO32PxahZnElc3TN/
     

Share This Page