1. Wasn’t 18 already in effect? Why do it again?
  2. 18 is for leadership and off the field intangibles whereas Patrick created 7 for playmakers on the field. Both having been created by players I find it odd to find issue with either.
    TheRealist, TigerTap and GregLSU like this.
  3. 18 seems cheapened by 7. Didn’t they proceed to add an offense defense 18 as well? Too much. I don’t feel strongly about it, just seems like too much.
  4. Anything that rewards and inspires leadership and playmaking is a good thing.
    TheRealist, TigerTap and Brian like this.
  5. 'We' didn't invent it. It was started by the players and evolved from there. I don't have a problem with it, unless it goes to someone undeserving, like it apparently did this time.

    There is a certain logic to that approach, but I don't think a player is not going to play hard or give 110% if he's not wearing a specific number. It's seems to be an innocent player owned tradition which I don't think it's a very big deal that they do it.
    Bengal B likes this.
  6. Not working this year. You’re pro turnover chain?
  7. I was thinking Delpit but Greedy would certainly be another.