Tigers Hogs Game thread?

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by SabanFan, Feb 8, 2006.

  1. Blackstripes

    Blackstripes Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2004
    Messages:
    177
    Likes Received:
    0
    I dont know if this near "meltdown" was due to fatigue, but it seemed more contributed to lack of focus and urgency.

    I know its never good going into a rivals home court with them losing a game, especially with them coming off a lost, but hopefully this near miss will get LSU’s head screwed on right
     
  2. tirk

    tirk im the lyrical jessie james

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    47,369
    Likes Received:
    21,536
    anatomically impossible for you.
     
  3. scrappy

    scrappy Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2004
    Messages:
    1,408
    Likes Received:
    10
    I knew that you and I had something in common after all.:thumb:
     
  4. Berge

    Berge Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2004
    Messages:
    4,127
    Likes Received:
    218
    I am shocked that no one has brought up the fact that we won this game due to a clutch three-pointer....

    Last year, Arkansas hit a clutch three-pointer.... but it was ruled a two-pointer later, and we went into OT......


    Geaux Tigers.... :thumb:
     
  5. Berge

    Berge Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2004
    Messages:
    4,127
    Likes Received:
    218
    Also more irony...

    The students were chanting "Choke... Choke... Choke..." when McCurdy was shooting his free throws when LSU was about to do just that.....

    heh...
     
  6. tirk

    tirk im the lyrical jessie james

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    47,369
    Likes Received:
    21,536
    nah i was already through with basic training when i was your age. maybe my girlfriend has my left one in her purse but that's another story unto itself.

    damn, you still haven't contributed? nutless and a tightwad.
     
  7. Berge

    Berge Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2004
    Messages:
    4,127
    Likes Received:
    218
    They all seem to be complaining that Davis's foul at the end on McCurdy was an intentional... which, from what I saw, is an accurate complaint. I thought it was when I saw it.....

    However... How would that have changed anything? Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought an intentional foul gives you two shots, then the other team gets the ball; same as a shooting foul, right?

    Same situation, he shoots two bricks, we get the rebound, we win....

    Please correct me if that is wrong.
     
  8. Jeffinbama

    Jeffinbama Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2002
    Messages:
    556
    Likes Received:
    9
    2 shots and they would have gotten the ball.
     
  9. Berge

    Berge Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2004
    Messages:
    4,127
    Likes Received:
    218
    OK... I thought that an intentional was a different penalty than a technical.
     
  10. RedElephants

    RedElephants Founding Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2005
    Messages:
    1,975
    Likes Received:
    83
    I hear the guy shooting the free throws hadn't played a minute of the whole game...Is this correct?

    What in the hell was Heath thinking putting him in there then?!
     

Share This Page