Why do you keep saying that? Who is saying that it is? You are like a two year old. It was in response to you saying killing someone while drinking and driving was an accident. Its not. It was intentionally because you know the risks.
This rewriting of what constitutes an accident is not valid. People can be irresponsible and negligent and have an accident . . . or not have one. Likewise, people can be sober and have an accident . . . or not have one. There is no correlation between irresponsible negligence and accidents. The driver would have been charged for his negligent homicide, not for premeditated murder. His negligence was completely his responsibility, but the deaths were still accidental, not intentional.
His negligence was intentional. He MADE the choice to drink and drive. It is a proven fact that drinking and driving kills people. I dont care what he would have been or wouldn't have been charged with. He intentionally drove while drunk. All results because of his decision are in fact intentional. Being stupid is not a pass. Just as revenge is not a free pass to kill someone.
Who said it was a free pass? The guy was going to tried for negligent homicide! How is getting executed without trial a free pass? One more time . . . a person can be irresponsible and still have a car wreck that is accidental, not premeditated. Accidental doesn't mean not responsible, it means not intentional.
Don't worry about it. I'm just pulling a Red One more time. There has been and will continue to be more than enough education that when you drink and drive, you are intentionally putting yourself and others in harms way. We are not talking about some accident where he was going to fast and hit the kids. He was drunk. End of story.
You are being perceptive, analytical, articulate, and convincing? Naaaaa . . . At last we agree that it was some kind of accident. And yes, this one involved a drunk.
