My theory is USC lost on purpose in the hope we would get left out of the Rose Bowl. Another reason to hate USC... Anyway...The Rose could still take LSU over Michigan should Florida get to Glendale. They still would have the at large. It would boil down to dollars I think. Will Michigan travel? We know LSU will...in bunches. Wow...that scenario puts Michigan all the way down to the Cap One Bowl...or at least having ND moved to Florida and Michigan in the Sugar. Ain't this fun?
In the scenario where Florida wins 3 of the 4 polls (with 2 being thrown out) we get: Florida...... .950 Michigan... .930 That's .020 of the .032 margin they need to make up. I really do think they will make up the rest of that margin (.012) in the human polls. It's the equivalent of only 5 voters from each of the coaches and Harris polls (a total of 10 voters) to switch their positioning of Michigan and Florida.
So, you think Florida will overtake UM in the final poll now? I was reading some posts on a UM board and a couple of compelling thoughts came to mind from what they said. First, if USC won tonight's game and if UF won against Arky, would UF have jumped UM in th polls? And if not, why should they now just because USC lost?
Because Florida just won another really tough game against a top 10 opponent, on a neutral site, and won their conference (which Michigan did not). Florida could very well have jumped Michigan in the polls had USC won. We will never know obviously. The other interesting thing to consider is the timing of the loss with USC today. The loss puts a void on everyone's card at #2 (well for those who have USC #2, which is most voters). They aren't "dropping" Michigan in this scenario, they would merely be placing Florida 2nd ahead of them. Not sure if that makes any sense, but it could have a psychological effect on the voters in how they think about their ballot. I think if Michigan would be #2 and Florida #3 going into this week with only the Florida game, then I wouldn't think Florida would have as much a chance.