gotta pay attention. "6. Coach would embarrass players publicly that didn’t perform--- 1.8" that's good. 1=strongly disagree this is a problem with this rating. a 1.8 in one category is good while a 1.8 in another is bad, so averaging them makes no sense. this doesnt explain the "corrupt" tag. how likely would the avg fan know clm is corrupt after 1.5 yrs?