My question is not quite so complexed. What is better for Tiger Forums, trolls like TC, or Tiger Forums without trolls like TC?opcorn:
TigerForums is a low-censorship zone as far as moderator policy. People can have unpopular viewpoints as long as they don't become simply inflammatory and run afoul of the User Agreement. As far as forum temperament, it is also a low-censorship zone so the users will sometimes get in the face of those that seem like troublemakers, muckrakers, and trolls. In this fashion you all help determine what is just grumbling by the fans and what is real troublemaking by an outsider. The regulars in The Den do not generally want it to become a free-for-all rival confrontation board like TOS. We move threads like that to The Sidelines.
With, just makes most people look better, you have to have the fat chick in the group! Plus we get to make fun of him.
nah, i disagree, he has a right to his opinion, if no one likes it, just ignore him, we don't have to read what he posts. I mean hell, what if LSU does end up with a losing record this year and Miles gets canned? I don't think that will happen, but i can't sit here and guarantee it won't. Although i must admit the topic of this thread is pretty useless.
Coach A: 65 games, 51 wins, 14 losses, .785 win pct., 1 Nat'l Title, 1 Conf. Title, 2 SECW Titles, 4-1 Bowl record Coach B: 64 games, 48 wins, 16 losses, .750 win pct., 1 Nat'l Title, 2 Conf. Titles, 2.5 SECW Titles, 3-2 Bowl record Why does Coach A receive such a disproportionate amount of criticism in relation to Coach B? Especially when Coach A has won more games in the same amount of time?
