Why gun owners oppose ban on "assault weapons" | Page 2 | TigerFan.com

Winston1 · Jun 23, 2016

With all the hysteria about so called assault weapons the facts always get in the way.
Http://www.businessinsider.com/gloc...) 2016-06-23&utm_term=Business Insider Select

shane0911 · Jun 23, 2016

Somewhere @Jmg is smiling

LSUTiga · Jun 23, 2016

HalloweenRun said: ↑

The problem is that there is no such thing, in the civilian world as "an assault rifle."

Since they only exists in the minds of the anti-gun crowd, they cannot be strictly defined. Since one can't be strictly defined, it is IMPOSSIBLE to limit a ban on just "assault weapons." It would look pretty stupid if the liberals tried to ban scary, black guns. That is about as close to a definition as you are going to get, that does not sweep in many, many legitimate hunting rifles.

A more rational venture would be limiting magazine capacity. Not saying I am for that, but at least it would be quantifiable.
Click to expand...

Shhhh. And I agree completely. It's also why I purchased a few extra 15 round mags for my Glocks. My G 26 a.k.a. Baby Glock, only has a 10 round mag. The magazines are interchangeable though. I can shove a 15 round magazine in it and it'll work fine. Just has a lot sticking out of bottom.