Why It Is Mathematically Impossible for Trump to win the White House

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by Tiger in NC, Mar 18, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Go look at turnout data. So far, republican turnout has been close to double from 2008 while the Dems have gone down. This favors Trump and is a direct reason he won the primary.

    [​IMG]
     
    islstl likes this.
  2. Tiger in NC

    Tiger in NC There's a sucker born everyday...

    http://www.politifact.com/punditfac...brooks-said-primary-turnout-doesnt-predict-g/
    http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/primary-turnout-means-nothing-for-the-general-election/
    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/02/01/how_much_does_voter_turnout_matter_112990.html
    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/what-do-the-voting-turnout-numbers-say-about-the-2016-presidential-race/

    Here are four articles that dispell your assertion that high voter turnout in primaries is an indication of general election results. If you like I can post the other ten thousand like them. So, no it doesn't favor Trump. It doesn't favor anybody.
     
  3. islstl

    islstl Playoff committee is a group of great football men Staff Member

    Oh that silly Tiger in NC.
     
    Tiger in NC likes this.
  4. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    i never said that.
     
  5. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Trump is driving people to the polls. Your articles do not disprove that.

    I never made the correlation to primary results predict a win. Only that it shows the level of interest and support.

    It would be nice if you had the capacity to form an original thought.
     
  6. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Because you know. It's not about polls, it's about how well a candidate turns out people to vote and HRC has a poor track record. Bernie should have been asleep months ago according to "polls".
     
  7. KyleK

    KyleK Who, me? Staff Member

    Sure sounds like you were saying it favors him in the general.
     
  8. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    The level of support. Yes.
     
  9. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    It would be the same as saying the amount of enthusiasm Obama had 2008 had no effect on the general election. Which would be false.
     
  10. KyleK

    KyleK Who, me? Staff Member

    So NC refuting that it would make a difference made sense, yet you said that was not what you were inferring. Which is it?
     
    Tiger in NC likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page