Forums Register login What's New?
Why was Saban mediocre here?
Page 7 of 11
  1. Roster was not even close to "loaded" they had some good players but lacked a lot of depth
  2. You're new here. Know this: If I tell you there's cheese on the moon, go getcha crackas. I'll letcha slide this time but next time I may phuck you all up so go, and be warned.

  3. No
    Not really, they had a lot of good pieces but they were far from "stacked"
    Go back and look at the first roster Saban took over, you have Robert Royal, Craig Nall, Rohan Davey, Ryan Clark, Domnick Davis, Josh Reed, (who Saban moved to WR), Trev Faulk, Bradie James, as NFL talent.... The roster had a lot of good/great players but it lacked a lot of depth
  4. So Tiga again I ask you, does that mean he underachieved? Comparitavely speaking of course....
  7. Last time unchecked signed doesn't mean played under, which means didn't develop......
  8. Why? I haven't touched the thread title, per se. The point you and I are debating is whether or not he had a lot of talent when he got here. It's clear he did.
    LSUDad likes this.
  9. Yep, like I said, Hal Hunter showed the talent that was here. Too easy to see.
    LSUTiga likes this.
  10. Saban doesn't rely on depth until the starters have secured the win. Then he'll send in his backups to draw the personal foul calls and write the apology notes the following week.
    StaceyO and Contained Chaos like this.
(You have insufficient privileges to reply here.)
Page 7 of 11