1. Not unless he can play OL.:)
  2. Red and LaSalle already said it. We have a bevy of great WRs, many of whom do not get the ball often enough as it is.

    At CB, we do not have that depth. He's right where he should be.
  3. umm, unless he can play OL...he!! no
    1 person likes this.
  4. No.
  5. We have the playmakers, we just have to get them the ball. So there is absolutely no need for Peterson to get reps on O. Let him focus on becoming the greatest CB in LSU history.
  6. That is hillarious!!!...and unfortunately a true statement!:geaux:
  7. I like him with the ball in his hands, but would prefer if he sticks to returning INTs for TDs. We have enough playmakers on O. He's a godsend to our D though. I love watching him each week.
    1 person likes this.
  8. I think he would be a great Quarterback !!

    Just think, if he threw those interceptions last year, at least we'd have somebody who knew how to tackle...NO pick 6's...ever !!

    We also ought to move Rahim Alem to fullback. Then we'd have someone else on offense who knew how to tackle....

    Whatcha think Salty One ???? :hihi:.
  9. No I would not. I just want him to keep playing like he has on defense.
  10. Ya, lets get him on the other side, get him injured doing something I'm sure he hasn't practiced or is comfortable with and leave the secondary to Hawkins and Eugene...

    Not