You're gonna have to kill some crackers | Page 7 | TigerFan.com

LSUMASTERMIND · Jul 19, 2010

UPDATED: Manufactured scandal: Right wing's phony allegations against the Justice Department | Media Matters for America

hmmmmmm?

Reality: Adams' accusations don't stand up to the facts

Adams is a long-time right-wing activist, who is known for filing an ethics complaint against Hugh Rodham that was subsequently dismissed, served as a Bush poll watcher in Florida 2004, and reportedly volunteered for a Republican group that trains lawyers to fight "racially tinged battles over voting rights";
Adams was hired to the Justice Department in 2005 by Bradley Schlozman, who was found by the Department of Justice Inspector General and Office of Professional Responsibility to have improperly considered political affiliation when hiring career attorneys -- the former head of the DOJ voting rights section reportedly said that Adams was "exhibit A of the type of people hired by Schlozman";
Adams has admitted that he does not have first-hand knowledge of the events, conversations, and decisions that he is citing to advance his accusations;
The Bush administration's Justice Department -- not the Obama administration -- made the decision not to pursue criminal charges against members of the New Black Panther Party for alleged voter intimidation at a polling center in Philadelphia in 2008;
The Obama administration successfully obtained default judgment against Samir Shabazz, a member of the New Black Panther Party carrying a nightstick outside the Philadelphia polling center on Election Day 2008;
The Bush administration DOJ chose not to pursue similar charges against members of the Minutemen, one of whom allegedly carried a weapon while harassing Hispanic voters in Arizona in 2006;
No voters have come forward to claim that they were intimidated from voting on account of the New Black Panthers standing outside the polling center in 2008;
The Republican vice chairwoman of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which is currently investigating the Justice Department's decision, reportedly said that conservatives on the Civil Rights Commission were trying to use New Black Panther case "to topple" the Obama administration. Thernston has also called the case "very small potatoes" and criticized the "overheated rhetoric filled with insinuations and unsubstantiated charges" surrounding it, and said that rhetoric has not "served the interests of the commission"; she further said that DOJ has given a "plausible argument" for not pursuing additional charges in the case.
Adams himself testified that he had no "indication" that the decision involved anyone "higher up" than an acting assistant attorney general.
The Obama Justice Department requested additional judgment against black leaders in Mississippi who were found to have discriminated against white voters.
Click to expand...

Swerved · Jul 19, 2010

Yeah because everyone knows that site is as neutral as they get... kinda like World Net Daily.. :yelwink2:

Did I do that correctly? :hihi:

SabanFan · Jul 19, 2010

LSUMASTERMIND said: ↑

UPDATED: Manufactured scandal: Right wing's phony allegations against the Justice Department | Media Matters for America

hmmmmmm?
Click to expand...

So they did it in 2008? Because that's when Bush was president.

TheDude · Jul 19, 2010

Media Matters is all you have to say. Mad magazine is more accurate.

And at least entertaining.

shane0911 · Jul 19, 2010

SabanFan said: ↑

So they did it in 2008? Because that's when Bush was president.
Click to expand...

Didn't you know? It is all dubya's fault. They just won't stop ever.

SabanFan · Jul 20, 2010

shane0911 said: ↑

Didn't you know? It is all dubya's fault. They just won't stop ever.
Click to expand...

Bush never fkd the white farmer.

LSUMASTERMIND · Jul 20, 2010

TheDude said: ↑

Media Matters is all you have to say. Mad magazine is more accurate.

And at least entertaining.
Click to expand...

Why would they just make up something like this that can be easily found if its a lie or the truth.
Instead of attacking the source find out if the information is right or wrong first, then we can discuss the source.

SabanFan · Jul 20, 2010

LSUMASTERMIND said: ↑

Why would they just make up something like this that can be easily found if its a lie or the truth.
Instead of attacking the source find out if the information is right or wrong first, then we can discuss the source.
Click to expand...

Like you do with Fox News and Rush Limbaugh? Gimme a break. Media Matters is a joke. Zero crdibility.

LSUMASTERMIND · Jul 20, 2010

SabanFan said: ↑

Like you do with Fox News and Rush Limbaugh? Gimme a break. Media Matters is a joke. Zero crdibility.
Click to expand...

Thats way different then your idols.

SabanFan · Jul 20, 2010

LSUMASTERMIND said: ↑

Thats way different then your idols.
Click to expand...

English translation please?